<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Looking to Barthes for Context and Meaning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cmediachange.net/2008/02/02/looking-to-barthes-for-context-and-meaning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cmediachange.net/2008/02/02/looking-to-barthes-for-context-and-meaning/</link>
	<description>Writings on Community, Communication, and Culture in the Digital Age</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 22:35:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Rhinesmith</title>
		<link>http://cmediachange.net/2008/02/02/looking-to-barthes-for-context-and-meaning/#comment-511</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Colin Rhinesmith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 13:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cmediachange.net/blog/2008/02/02/looking-to-barthes-for-context-and-meaning/#comment-511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for your comment, Jason.

I&#039;m beginning to focus on how early media coverage and films like &quot;Wayne&#039;s World&quot; helped create a divide between those with direct experience (i.e., community media producers) and those with indirect experience (i.e., community media viewers) during the first 25 years of public access.

What I hope to learn from this project is how this divide is playing out today. More specifically, I hope to show how recent media coverage of YouTube has collided with a popular perception - held by community media viewers, not practitioners - of public access television.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment, Jason.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m beginning to focus on how early media coverage and films like &#8220;Wayne&#8217;s World&#8221; helped create a divide between those with direct experience (i.e., community media producers) and those with indirect experience (i.e., community media viewers) during the first 25 years of public access.</p>
<p>What I hope to learn from this project is how this divide is playing out today. More specifically, I hope to show how recent media coverage of YouTube has collided with a popular perception &#8211; held by community media viewers, not practitioners &#8211; of public access television.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JDaniels</title>
		<link>http://cmediachange.net/2008/02/02/looking-to-barthes-for-context-and-meaning/#comment-510</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JDaniels]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 12:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cmediachange.net/blog/2008/02/02/looking-to-barthes-for-context-and-meaning/#comment-510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am interested to follow this particular thread.  My own experiences have led me to believe there is a mythology that pervades small time television stations and that their highest aspiration is to  emulate the broadcasters.

It seems that the Youtube / Access discussion delves into a different mythology.  Have you come to articulate what that is?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am interested to follow this particular thread.  My own experiences have led me to believe there is a mythology that pervades small time television stations and that their highest aspiration is to  emulate the broadcasters.</p>
<p>It seems that the Youtube / Access discussion delves into a different mythology.  Have you come to articulate what that is?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

