BTOP and PEG Access TV

I am developing a pilot study at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign to examine what role Public, Educational, and Governmental (PEG) access television stations are playing in the NTIA’s Broadband Technology Opportunities Program.

The purpose of the study is to understand how PEG access centers support sustainable broadband adoption through the use of public computing centers, digital and media literacy training, and other critical community services. This topic is also the focus of my dissertation.

I’ve created a Google Doc to begin compiling this list of PEG Access centers. Please feel free to add your center to the document.

If your PEG access center is involved – either directly or indirectly – in a BTOP project in your state, I hope you will consider contacting me at crhines (AT) illinois (DOT) edu. Please also consider leaving a comment below and I will look forward to following up with you.

Thank you for your time.

Broadband Media Centers as Anchor Institutions


Click here to listen.

2011 Alliance for Community Media International Conference and Exhibition
Tucson, AZ
July 27, 2011

Broadband Media Centers as Anchor Institutions

Among the Broadband Networks funded by State grants and Federal programs such as BTOP and BIP, are Community Media Centers that have partnered in some of these grant programs and position themselves as Community Anchor Institutions.

This preconference will put the spotlight on how these CMCs have positioned themselves as Libraries. What role will these CMCs play in design, construction and implementation of these networks? What new community communication  services will they be able to offer using these wireline and wireless networks? Come and learn the vision and plans of these CMCs and how they will be the prototypes and models for the future of Community Media.

Panel I: The BTOP Grant Process, the Role of CAIs and the Future of Federal Funding

Moderator:
Chuck Sherwood, TeleDimensions

Speakers:
Kathy Bisbee, Community Media Access Partnership
Tony Shawcross, Open Media Foundation

Panel II: Connected Broadband Media Centers and Their New Services

Speakers:
Jay April, Akaku Maui Community Television
Jen Gilomen, Bay Area Video Coalition
John Hauser , Access Humboldt
Craig Sinclair, Amherst Media

Evaluating BTOP Projects

I just returned from two days at the CBAIS conference in Cleveland, OH. I blogged about a few of the sessions here, here and here. I had the privilege of leading a breakout session, entitled “Data Gathering Tools & Process for Evaluation” with my colleague James Losey of the New America Foundation.

One of the questions that came up during our session was “How do we measure broadband adoption?”  In other words, what is broadband adoption and how do we know when it has been achieved? After a bit of back and forth, a challenge was put forward to BTOP grantees to use the ambiguity as an opportunity.  There is room for grantees to create their own definitions of broadband adoption and to define what success looks like to them and the communities they serve.

I have also been reading Dara O’Neil’s (2002) “Assessing community informatics: A review of methodological approaches for evaluating community networks and community technology centers” for a paper I’m writing with my colleague Adam Kehoe at UIUC. In O’Neil’s paper, she provides a list of “ICT evaluation guides” that have been designed to help researchers and practitioners evaluate the impacts of their community technology projects. While many of these papers are a bit dated, I thought I’d include a short bibliography below that might be helpful for those interested in creating their own definitions of broadband adoption:

Chow, C., Ellis, J. and Walker, G. (2000), CTCNet Evaluation Toolkit, Education Development Center, Newton, MA.

City of Seattle (2000), Information Technology Indicators for a Healthy Community, City of Seattle Department of Information Technology, Seattle, WA

Westat. (2000), Technology Opportunities Program Evaluation Guide: Community Networking and Services Projects , US Department of Commerce, National Telecommunications and Information Administration, Washington, DC.

O’Neil, D. (2002), Assessing Community Informatics: A Review of Methodological Approaches for Evaluating Community Networks and Community Technology Centers. Journal of Community Informatics, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 76-102.

TechSoup and Community Technology Network are also offering a free webinar tomorrow on evaluating digital literacy projects.  Here are the details:

WHAT: Evaluating Digital Literacy Programs
WHEN: Thursday, June 30, 2011, 11 am PST
REGISTER: https://cc.readytalk.com/r/14jcx57poov4
COST: FREE!

If you have an evaluation guide to share, please leave a comment below with details.

UPDATE JULY 8, 2011

Here are a few more resources from the NTIA and the archive of the TechSoup webinar:

BTOP: User v. Subscriber v. Adopter???

At the CBAIS conference in Cleveland today, Laura Breeden of the National Telecommunications and Information Administration helped to clarify the following questions: “Who is an adopter, who is a subscriber, and who do we count?” for BTOP grantees in the audience.

Breeden said the NTIA is asking BTOP grantees to count household broadband subscribers, business subscribers, and users of public access computing facilities. She said it’s very important for grantees to keep track of people who become subscribers. It’s also important for grantees to track numbers of people who complete, and express interest in, training. Breeden told the audience that the NTIA for as much information as possible across the entire continuum of participants. The data will help to explain the story of the people who will continue to do this work long after BTOP is over.

Breeden told the audience that the NTIA also plans to provide more clarification on the definitions of users, subscribers, and adopters in July. She said that the NTIA is very interested in understanding the paths that people take towards becoming broadband adopters. Breeden reassured grantees that their investment in training and outreach is also important.

The Continuum

On one side of the broadband adoption continuum, Breeden explained that there are people who are afraid of the Internet. These individuals have not had success learning how to use the Internet.  On another side, there are people who use public access computer centers. These people have a Facebook page, a Gmail account – they are using broadband.

Then there are those who are, and are not, household broadband Internet subscribers. Some may be connecting to the Internet for free at the beginning, but they eventually move toward becoming a customer of broadband Internet service providers.

Q&A

Here are a few questions asked by audience members, followed by summary responses by Laura Breeden:

Q: If a person lives next door to a computer center and can get a wireless signal in their home, does that person count as a subscriber?

A: No. The individual is not a subscriber if he/she is not paying for it. The person is a user.

Q: If somebody is not paying for a broadband connection, but paying for Luminosity, a monthly service that you can get online, does that person count as a subscriber?

A: NTIA needs to look into this.

User, adopter, subscriber . . . The NTIA is looking to collect more of these stories in order to help them define these terms.